top of page

Project Managers Can Develop Quick Estimates with Confidence
Project managers can develop quick estimates with confidence.

The term “guesstimate” is an estimate made with a combination of guesswork and calculation. It’s an approximate calculation when you don’t have all the facts or precise data. Project managers find themselves needing to rely on guesstimates as projects move through implementation. Even more, project developers live on guesstimates in the conceptual development phase. The central question is whether there is a structured way to do a guesstimate.

 

Brief Examples

Guesstimate blend of the words “guess” and “estimate.”

 

As a project manager, you receive an estimate that site cleanup after a storm will take some time. When pressed, the contractor says, "About a week.”

 

A change order request includes a unique process controller. The equipment vendor tells the designer and contractor that the base equipment is available and easy to quote. However, the special controller is back-ordered due to a version update. When asked for a price, the vendor replies, “The supplier will not even quote it, but I would budget $10,000.”

 

Both are simple examples of guesstimates that project managers deal with every day. When developing an entire project, the magnitude of the guesstimate is bigger and contains a lot more uncertainty.

 

Measurement

Measurement is a process of assigning numbers to objects so that the unique relationships of the objects and the unique properties of the numbers themselves are reflected. Two fundamental measurement theories are representativeness, meaning that objects can actually be assigned to a number, and uniqueness, meaning that a number cannot be assigned to the same object by different measurers.

 

As project developers or managers, we would like to have a single scale of measurement for all of our variables. That's why we often try to reduce everything to a dollar or time value.

 

Quantitative versus Qualitative

Quantitative means of, relating to, or involving the measurement of quantity or amount. Think inches, feet, meters, pounds, or kilograms. Measurement theory applies to significant decimal places.

 

Qualitative means of, relating to, or involving quality or kind of things. Think beauty, fun, heat or cold, or color. We can often develop a scale, 1 to 5 or 1 to 10, to help describe the weight of evidence. The quality of some things is not easily measured with a unique scale.

 

As project developers or managers, we want all quantitative values to be developed from a singular scale. Unfortunately, that's usually not the case. Now, we are moving into the world of guesstimates.

 

Objective versus Subjective

Objective means expressing or dealing with facts or conditions as perceived without distortion by personal feelings, prejudices, or interpretations. Unless you are in a laboratory where input variables can be isolated, it is almost impossible for an estimate to be absent of personal feelings, prejudices, or interpretations.

 

The challenge is really how to make something less subjective.

 

We normally do this by adding some degree of quantification and scale.

 

Truncated (or trimmed) Mean: An Approach for Reliable Guesstimates

A truncated or trimmed mean is a statistical measure of central tendency, much like the mean and median. It involves the calculation of the mean after discarding given parts of a probability distribution or sample at the high and low end.

 

In practice, our resources are usually limited to 5 to 10 people providing their best guesses. We drop the lowest and highest values. Then, we average what's left.

 

A Structured Way to Do Guesstimates

In practice, guesstimates are improved by asking more than one party and sorting through a common value.

 

In the example of cleanup after a storm, a project manager would call five or six other contractors with similar experience or in the same situation. Throw out the low and high values. Average the rest of the values. Feel good about the guesstimate if the average is close to the contractor's estimate.

 

It’s a little harder with specialty parts and backorders, but the same process applies. Talk to five or six other people with the same experience, throw out the high and low estimates, average the rest, and decide whether to take the guesstimate.

 

On bigger issues like how long it takes to get something permitted, assemble a panel of subject matter experts and formally facilitate the process.

 

Should Project Managers Rely on a Guesstimate?

Project managers are forced to rely on guesstimates every day. There's nothing wrong with that. This brief article provides some insights and a method for making guesstimates better. Look for more on how calibration of the estimators and Monte Carlo simulations can improve guesstimates more if the context requires it. For now, project managers should do their best every day to improve the guesstimates we live by.



References

  • Wikipedia

  • "A Revisit of the Scales, Measurement Theory, and Statistical Analysis Controversy"



 

JD Solomon Inc. provides solutions for program development, asset management, and facilitation at the nexus of facilities, infrastructure, and the environment. Sign up for monthly updates related to our firm.


 

JD Solomon is the founder of JD Solomon, Inc., the creator of the FINESSE fishbone diagram®, and the co-creator of the SOAP criticality method©. He is the author of Communicating Reliability, Risk & Resiliency to Decision Makers: How to Get Your Boss’s Boss to Understand and Facilitating with FINESSE: A Guide to Successful Business Solutions.



The new federal drinking water PFAS regulations are likely to be impacted by the revised Chevron doctrine
The new federal drinking water PFAS regulations are likely to be impacted by the revised Chevron doctrine.

The US Supreme Court handed down its decision reversing the Chevron deference in late June 2024. Critics screamed there would be degradation of public health and death. Supporters of the decision argued that the bureaucracy has run amuck, and the decision restores the proper balance of power between the judiciary and administrative agencies. There has been a rash of lawsuits, but the reality is that neither extreme has happened. That is set to change in a few months as the new PFAS regulations move through the courts.

 

What is Chevron?

Chevron deference is a legal principle established in 1984 that directs courts to defer to a federal agency's interpretation of ambiguous laws that the agency administers. The recent Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo ruling overturned this doctrine, meaning courts will no longer automatically defer to agencies' interpretations of ambiguous statutes. This change requires agencies to have clearer congressional authorization for significant regulatory actions.

 

Recent opinions by the US Supreme Court in West Virginia v. EPA and Corner Post v. CFPB also reaffirm the court’s interpretation of limited administrative interpretation powers.

 

What is PFAS?

PFAS stands for per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances.

 

According to the USEPA, PFAS are manufactured chemicals that have been used in industry and consumer products since the 1940s. Because of their widespread use and persistence in the environment, many PFAS are found in the blood of people and animals worldwide.

 

There are thousands of different PFAS, some of which have been more widely used and studied than others.

 

What are the proposed PFAS Standards?

In April 2024, USEPA issued the first-ever national, legally enforceable drinking water standard to protect communities from exposure to harmful PFAS. According to USEPA, the final rule will reduce PFAS exposure for approximately 100 million people, prevent thousands of deaths, and reduce tens of thousands of serious illnesses.

 

USEPA established legally enforceable levels, called Maximum Contaminant Levels (MCLs), for six PFAS in drinking water: PFOA, PFOS, PFHxS, PFNA, and HFPO-DA.

 

The levels for PFOA and PFAS of 4 parts per trillion (ppt) have drawn the most controversy.

 

Four ppt in an Olympic-sized swimming pool (2.5 million liters) is equivalent to 10 micrograms (µg) of any substance. Ten micrograms is smaller than a single drop from an eyedropper. So, 4 ppt is more like adding a tiny fraction of a grain of salt to an Olympic-sized swimming pool rather than a single drop from an eyedropper. It's such a minuscule amount that it's hard to visualize with common household items.

Critics argue that insufficient human health or environmental evidence justifies the extremely low levels.

 

What are the legal challenges to PFAS Drinking Water Standards?

Several federal-level lawsuits have been consolidated into one. The American Water Works Association (AWWA) and Association of Metropolitan Water Agencies (AMWA) provide a good summary of the challenges. Both organizations partner with USEPA, and neither has filed lawsuits against USEPA.

 

"AWWA and AMWA share the US Environmental Protection Agency's goal of protecting people from potentially harmful levels of PFAS in drinking water. Both AMWA and AWWA supported EPA's decision to swiftly pursue development of a national PFAS regulation, and we provided the agency with robust, constructive comments to maximize public health benefits in a cost-effective manner.

 

“We are concerned, however, that EPA did not use the best available data and appropriate processes in developing the PFAS regulation. For example, we question the use of a novel ‘Hazard Index’ in place of a Maximum Contaminant Level for mixtures of certain PFAS, and the issuing of a preliminary determination to regulate certain PFAS simultaneously with the proposed rule.

 

“The rule significantly underestimates nationwide costs, does not take into account the latest PFAS data, and will add to affordability challenges for many households without achieving the public health outcomes we all seek.

 

“Scientific process matters, especially when it will set precedent for how EPA develops future drinking water regulations. AMWA and AWWA therefore believe it is prudent to ask a court to verify that EPA constructed the PFAS regulation according to the letter and spirit of the Safe Drinking Water Act, and to give EPA an opportunity to revisit any components of the rule that fell short.”

 

Why is PFAS a good challenge for the new Chevron Doctrine?

The proposed PFAS standards by the USEPA are seen by some as an example of overstepping their congressional mandate due to several reasons.

 

Ambiguity in Congressional Authorization

Critics argue that the EPA interprets its authority too broadly under existing environmental laws like the Safe Drinking Water Act and the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA). They claim that Congress did not explicitly authorize the EPA to regulate PFAS to the extent proposed.

 

Chevron Doctrine

The new PFAS standards could be challenged under the revised interpretation of the Chevron doctrine. This doctrine traditionally allowed agencies like the EPA to interpret ambiguous statutes. However, recent Supreme Court decisions have limited this deference, suggesting that significant regulatory actions require clear congressional authorization.

 

Economic and Practical Implications

Implementing these standards could impose significant costs on industries and municipalities. Opponents argue that such impactful regulations should be directly mandated by Congress rather than through agency rulemaking.

 

PFAS, Chevron, SCOTUS, and What It Means to You

Death and destruction? Probably not. Draining the administrative swamp? Again, probably not. But there is a good chance that the Supreme Court’s Chevron deference decision will modify the new PFAS regulations as they make their way through the courts early next year.

  

 

References:




 

JD Solomon Inc. provides solutions for program development, asset management, and facilitation at the nexus of facilities, infrastructure, and the environment. Sign up for monthly updates related to our firm.


 

JD Solomon served in executive leadership roles at two Fortune 500 companies before starting JD Solomon, Inc., just before the pandemic. JD is the founder of Communicating with FINESSE®, the creator of the FINESSE fishbone diagram®, and the co-creator of the SOAP criticality method©. He is the author of Communicating Reliability, Risk & Resiliency to Decision Makers: How to Get Your Boss’s Boss to Understand and Facilitating with FINESSE: A Guide to Successful Business Solutions.

 



Are strategic plans overrated? As Mike Tyson is attributed to saying, "Everyone has a strategic plan until they get punched in the mouth."
Are strategic plans overrated? As Mike Tyson is attributed to saying, "Everyone has a strategic plan until they get punched in the mouth."

Are strategic plans overrated? The answer is often ‘yes’ because they are created and implemented poorly. The better question is whether strategic planning is a waste of time, and that answer is ‘no.’ Every organization needs a written consensus on what is good for the integrated whole. This article covers more on the topic and distinguishes between strategic and operational activities. As Mike Tyson is attributed to saying, "Everyone has a strategic plan until they get punched in the mouth."

 

New Job: "Strategy is Overrated"

A professional colleague changed jobs a few years ago. We worked closely for about a decade and I knew his key skills were setting strategy and closing deals. I ran into him at a national conference (actually in a bar) and the conversation went something like the following.

 

"So, what do you like least about the new job?" I inquired. He knew me well enough that I wouldn't brush through a generic question and then listen to a lot of BS.

 

“I am having to adjust to their lack of strategic planning,” as he started to gaze in search of the right words. “You know that setting a strategic plan is one of my strengths. Executing a well-thought plan is just how my mind works.”

 

“That’s odd," I replied as I started to look for the bartender. Refocusing again, “How do you know a big organization like that doesn’t like strategic plans?”

 

“Because my boss told me so,” came a somber reply. “He said that he thought strategy was over-related and we needed to focus on tactics. His boss was in the meeting and agreed.”

 

Pitfalls of Strategic Plans

The quote from Mike Tyson about everyone having a plan until they get punched in the face reminds us that all strategy in the world will not help us when our brains are getting beat in. in the fight, there is only the fight.

 

But the quote doesn’t really tell you why strategic plans are flawed.

 

I’ll save the textbook discussions on too much complexity, lack of post-plan communication, lack of implementation ownership, too many strategies, underfunding, and lack of confusing planning with a strategic plan.

 

The greatest pitfall of Strategic Plans is organization leadership creating a politically correct communication piece instead of meaning something to front-line staff. Remember, strategic means “of great importance within an integrated whole.”  Most leadership teams forget about the integrated whole.


 

Benefits of Strategic Plans

According to 'the book,' all organizations need direction, focus, resource allocation, performance management, and a communication framework. I'll bet the Mike Tyson organization had a strategic plan, even if Iron Mike didn't think it meant much when he was in the fight.

 

Arguably, tiny organizations, tech startups, and companies in extreme crisis may not need a strategic plan. They are in the fight, and tactics matter most.

 

Nearly all organizations need a strategic plan. My top three reasons are that we benefit from the exercise, align the top of the organization with the front line, and create a communication framework for the future. The value of a strategic plan comes down to how well it is done.

 

Real Stories

State Department of Transportation

“We can’t buy toilet paper,” said the District Administrator, “And you consultants show up with your handlers from the state capitol.”

 

Clearly, he had been punched in the mouth and was already in the fight. The buy-in of the state strategic plan from the districts was not forthcoming.

 

Someone at the top of the organization should have included front-line staff at the start of the process. I am sure the district administrator believed for the rest of his career that strategic plans are overrated.

 

Shaking It Up

Mount Pleasant Waterworks General Manager Clay Duffie wanted to shake up his annual board retreats. My suggestion was to integrate front-line staff in several active ways. 

 

He agreed and went one step further–he banned all PowerPoint presentations from the two-day event. Everyone had to interact as humans with each other.

 

We wrote papers and did conference presentations on how well it worked. More importantly, it created a bond between staff and the Board that severed the organization well when Clay retired a few years later.

 

Using the Plan as a Communication Tool

Joe Mantua inherited a newly developed Strategic Plan for Beaufort Water and Sewer Authority. Although he wasn't a big fan of it, as the new General Manager, he used it as a communication framework for his remarks at all of the Board meetings.

 

A few years later, Joe and I put together a survey when we embarked on developing a new strategic plan. I wasn't surprised when front-line staff said they hated it. However, I was surprised when the Board almost unanimously said they liked or loved it.

 

Why the divide? Joe had effectively used the plan as a communication tool, at least to the Board. The Board was shocked when they discovered the disconnect between the strategic plan and front-line staff. The Board had not been punched in the mouth, but the staff was fully engaged in a tactical fight with day-to-day issues not covered by the plan. The real value of the plan was in the planning effort.

 

Are Strategic Plans Overrated?

Strategic plans may be overrated, but strategic planning certainly is not. Neither is overrated when done well.



 

JD Solomon Inc. provides solutions for program development, asset management, and facilitation at the nexus of facilities, infrastructure, and the environment. Sign up for monthly updates related to our firm.


 

JD Solomon is the founder of JD Solomon, Inc., the creator of the FINESSE fishbone diagram®, and the co-creator of the SOAP criticality method©. He is the author of Communicating Reliability, Risk & Resiliency to Decision Makers: How to Get Your Boss’s Boss to Understand and Facilitating with FINESSE: A Guide to Successful Business Solutions.

 

Experts
bottom of page